REALITY of GALWAN FACE OFF:
REALITY of GALWAN FACE OFF:
As #agreed to resolve through #talks & either Army to go back to original position.
#IndianArmy,being committed & Peace keeper,backed to their original position,
but #ChinaArmy not backed to their original position.
Indian Army went to the disputed place to ask China Army to go back to thier original position.Face off started,when China Army refused to go back and reiterated Galwan thiers.
Point to be noted,
Indian Army went there with #Motives to ask China Army to go back peacefully to thier original position,otherwise to remove them from the disputed place forcefully. Else, China Army would have positioned at the disputed place.
When Indian Army forces were going to be Faced Off with China Army,how they, without being armed, would go there.
Is it argumentative, Indian Army Forces were going to be killed knowingly there?
Off course, not.They, being armed, went there.
When China Army stubborned that Galwan thiers and not to go back to their original position, Indian soldiers were determined to push back China Army forces to their original position. Face off was obvious there.China Army were pushed back to their original position. So they faught with Indian Army.Either side soldiers were killed in the face off.
We need to find the Facts Analytically, rather bringing Ambiguity on Govt. Historically, No Govt would want its Soldiers to be suffered,whether it's powerful or weaker.
Note:
India declared its 20 soldiers killed.
China doesn't declare,how many its soldiers killed? Analytically,it would declare, if the number would be less than India. Obviously, the number of Chinese soldiers killed are more than Indian soldiers killed.
I am not happy with the either side soldiers killed. I am unhappy that China stubborn to possess entire Galwan Valley and not want to maintain status quo there and start dialogue to resolve the dispute through talks Peacefully.
No powerful can say it as powerful. Time alters it. Time is powerful. History says.
As #agreed to resolve through #talks & either Army to go back to original position.
#IndianArmy,being committed & Peace keeper,backed to their original position,
but #ChinaArmy not backed to their original position.
Indian Army went to the disputed place to ask China Army to go back to thier original position.Face off started,when China Army refused to go back and reiterated Galwan thiers.
Point to be noted,
Indian Army went there with #Motives to ask China Army to go back peacefully to thier original position,otherwise to remove them from the disputed place forcefully. Else, China Army would have positioned at the disputed place.
When Indian Army forces were going to be Faced Off with China Army,how they, without being armed, would go there.
Is it argumentative, Indian Army Forces were going to be killed knowingly there?
Off course, not.They, being armed, went there.
When China Army stubborned that Galwan thiers and not to go back to their original position, Indian soldiers were determined to push back China Army forces to their original position. Face off was obvious there.China Army were pushed back to their original position. So they faught with Indian Army.Either side soldiers were killed in the face off.
We need to find the Facts Analytically, rather bringing Ambiguity on Govt. Historically, No Govt would want its Soldiers to be suffered,whether it's powerful or weaker.
Note:
India declared its 20 soldiers killed.
China doesn't declare,how many its soldiers killed? Analytically,it would declare, if the number would be less than India. Obviously, the number of Chinese soldiers killed are more than Indian soldiers killed.
I am not happy with the either side soldiers killed. I am unhappy that China stubborn to possess entire Galwan Valley and not want to maintain status quo there and start dialogue to resolve the dispute through talks Peacefully.
No powerful can say it as powerful. Time alters it. Time is powerful. History says.
